Court Rejects Blue Whale Protection

One recurring theme I seem to come across when researching endangered whales and their poaching, is government sanctions to either protect them or just the opposite. Such is the case in a recent release by the AP in which courts in Southern California recently rejected a lawsuit against the coast guard for better protection of blue whales. Apparently in recent months several were killed by passing ships in the Santa Barbara Channel.

“U.S. District Judge Maxine Chesney rejected an argument by the Center for Biological Diversity that the Coast Guard should comply with the Endangered Species Act when it regulates ship traffic. Chesney issued a summary judgment Monday in San Francisco.

In her decision, Chesney said that the Coast Guard’s daily management of shipping traffic does not by itself trigger Endangered Species Act requirements. The environmental group failed to show that the agency is engaged in any specific action that would require it to initiate such measures, the judge said.

Andrea Treece, an attorney for the environmental group, said her client has not decided whether to appeal the decision.

“It’s unfortunate the judge took such a narrow view of what was before her,” she said.

Stephanie Young, spokeswoman for the Coast Guard in Los Angeles, said they don’t comment on legal decisions but added that the agency takes protecting marine animals seriously. Following the whale deaths that prompted the lawsuit, the Coast Guard conducted aerial monitoring of whales and recommended that mariners reduce their speeds in the Santa Barbara Channel.

The lawsuit was filed after three of the endangered mammals were confirmed to have been hit by ships and another two whale carcasses were also spotted in 2007. The incidents around the channel caught the group’s attention because the death toll was much higher than the acceptable level for non-natural whale deaths, said Treece, who called the deaths “heart-stopping.”

Less than 10,000 blue whales are left in the world’s oceans after being reduced by whaling.

Blue whales normally pass through the channel on their way to feed in grounds further north and are usually gone by the end of August. In 2007, however, a large number of whales stayed to feed in the channel, which holds some of the busiest shipping lanes in the world.”– Noaki Schwartz (AP)

Don’t get me wrong, I am much in the support of saving endangered whales, however I think there has to be a line drawn somewhere. The coast guard has enough problems of its own with just regulating ship traffic in and out of the seas surrounding California; to put this additional helping on their plate seems a bit ludicrous to me.

Advertisements

~ by jjfunston on April 1, 2009.

3 Responses to “Court Rejects Blue Whale Protection”

  1. Great site this animalsndanger.wordpress.com and I am really pleased to see you have what I am actually looking for here and this this post is exactly what I am interested in. I shall be pleased to become a regular visitor πŸ™‚

  2. terrific site this animalsndanger.wordpress.com great to see you have what I am actually looking for here and this this post is exactly what I am interested in. I shall be pleased to become a regular visitor πŸ™‚

  3. nice site this animalsndanger.wordpress.com nice to see you have what I am actually looking for here and this this post is exactly what I am interested in. I shall be pleased to become a regular visitor πŸ™‚

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: